COAzilla reports

There was a technical error which causes that all blog post messages turned into a '1' and a new blog post was posted with a '1'. This causes the announcement on the front page. The situation was not intended.

Before the situation, the Inducks blog was not secret or closed, but open for everyone and free, so your message does not correspond with the reality.

Most of the time the main page is like today, Blog page is invisible. This aplies only for simple users.
Others like, members, users with cvs, inducksers, team, can read all the invisible parts.
I know that there are also other sections that are not available, like some stories. We see only the first page but someone informed me that there are complete stories to read in inducks.
Even if this is not true, in coa are some of my reports with this label "This report is shown to Pavlos and Inducks members only".
If inducks wants to have sections for the elit team it is understandable. But inducks's database and info is for everyone. And for everyone's availability to have them we all participated.
Also, I think it is time for inducks to reward those who participate.

"Most of the time the main page is like today, Blog page is invisible. This aplies only for simple users.
Others like, members, users with cvs, inducksers, team, can read all the invisible parts."
This is not true. When clicking on 'Inducks links' on the main page, you see a page with links. Under the section 'Special COA pages', you see a link to the 'COA blog', which directs to the COA blog. Since some days this page is closed for *everyone* due to technical security reason, but before, the page was open for *everyone*, and everyone could read all messages posted there, and post, as you did there.

"[...] in coa are some of my reports with this label "This report is shown to Pavlos and Inducks members only"."
That is right. Some users want to share information without their name public. We than make the report only visible to the original sender and Inducks members, to share the name of the sender with as less people as possible, as requested by some users.
Other reports which are not visible for everyone are reports like new indices, better descriptions and better scans. These reports only need to be approved. In order to hold COAzilla readable for rare visitors, these reports are only visible to the Inducks team.

"But inducks's database and info is for everyone. And for everyone's availability to have them we all participated."
Did you already visit the following page: https://inducks.org/inducks/ ? You can download the Inducks database there and see log messages about the database. The files are daily updated and you are free to distribute the data from the Inducks database, as long as you follow the license ( https://inducks.org/inducks/COPYING ).

The creator's biographes disapperaed, Most of the creators vanished. Only 1-3 names are in each letter.

I uploaded the file twice last Friday, and it didn't work. Now I've uploaded it again, and it worked. The only difference was that I used Explorer last Friday and Firefox today.......?????

Thank you.
The creator's gallery is ok.
Sometimes a browser makes auto adjustments without us knowing. Lately it seems that they are more and more frequent. It is better to have/use more than one browser.

searching for outducks thru any inducks code-page this is what opens
"Not Found
The requested domain name was not found on this server.
Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) PHP/5.5.9-1ubuntu4.14 OpenSSL/1.0.1f Server at inducks.org Port 80"

Outducks opens now as https.
I guess that it needs the same 6month renewal.

This is solved.

Yesterday Fabio Celoni was in Greece. Someone gave him a greek issue to sign after seeing in inducks that it is his. The code is IC PK 65. But Celoni told this person that this cover was NOT his. Maybe it is Pastrovicchio's.

It's there with a question-mark.

We know.

Duplicate of which report?
Is it because https creates the same problems as last year?

No, it is because some Greek publication had the wrong syntax and our software could not handle that. It should be fixed now (19:12 MET).

Thank you

Thank you

indeed you'r right, He's is Scrooge's twin brother. Do you have à scan Papirone De' Paperoni you can send me please ? :)

So, why are you asking him to send a scan of US's twin brother? I don't think he is really interested in sending scans to characters' pages because I never saw him doing that. I'm also not sure if he can answer you about the scan that you're talking about.

This story has images available from the link. The character is in the first page, the very first panel of Ι AΟ 55034-Α. No scan can be uploaded because there is no index for him. That is why "appearances" are marked "incomplete".
Nectaria, why do you take for granted what someone (you don't know) will or will not do?
This is not the place for this kind of messages.

He asked you if you can send a scan that is related to that character to him because he wanted to upload a scan to Papirone De Paperoni's page if it was made. If you think that my previous message was not the right place for this report then Sheamus' message was not the right place for the report either. He should ask that question in a private message instead of a report. If he never send this message to your report then I would never send a reply to his message. Actually, I didn't want to send a message to your report until I saw Sheamus McPicsou's message. Maybe it's okay to create a page for this character because he also appeared in a cover that is related to the story. Leopoldo Barrytone have sent a report about adding Papirone De Paperoni/US' twin brother to the xapp of the cover but the report haven't been solved yet: https://coa.inducks.o...lved=44680 .

Coazilla is ONLY an error report base. Also to complete the data base of inducks. New charactes that are not yet indexed are still to be found. But only main staff inducksers can solve these reports and fix problems.
What SMcP asked couldn't be answered. This is not a forum, group, page, blog. There is no way to send him here an image. So, his request was out of place. Also there are no other unknown images of that character besides the story. The image seen in the code is very good, no other needed.
Also you were out of place. Was he refering to you? Are you Pavlos? No, I am. You have no place to measure what I can or cannot do. You cannot see me not doing something? So what? Inducks is not only what you can see in it. There is more that only members and the head inducksers can see.
Also you no idea what my contribution in inducks is. I know inducks from the very first day. Even from the days of DCML. Look at Miky Maous No1. I gave data from the beginning to complete half of the greek gallery. I still do. You can ask fraply.
Our part is to give data and images, give error reports. And it stops there. If inducks wants to create his own forrum it is their decision although they need the available space for all the new indexes. There are maaany places in internet that we can comment about anything.
What anyone does in inducks is voluntary. There are no metals or awards for the one that gave the most data. All volunteers are important. It'a just a data base, a catalog, a list of something we all love as a hobby. I gave my index because I found others that love disney comics as much as I do. And now it feels good to see it complete.

Yes, I know that CoAzilla is only a place to report errors and but in this last message that you replied to me, you act like that I'm completely new to Inducks but that's not true. I first came to Inducks in 2007 and became a member in 2008 but I didn't sent my first report until in 2009. I know all the indexes of the greek magazines very well and I know what stories are in the issues (the ones that are completed not the incomplete ones). Same with other countries too. If you think that I have no idea what your contribution in Inducks is then you have no idea what is my contribution in Inducks either and my contribution is very different from yours. You haven't checked all my reports to see that I'm not a new member at all. Also, saying to someone "You have no idea" isn't nice because it makes you sound like you're a mean person. You also just have broken my heart because you made me very upset. Well, Inducks used to have its own forum called "Disney Comics Forum" and I was a member here before the forum have been closed. Please don't sent me another harsh message and If you continue that then I will never send message to you again. I wanted to talk you about Papirone De Paperoni's other appearance in a cover that is related to the story and you ignored this message. I still think that it is okay to create a page for an oneshot character like the ones who are related to the Ducks or the Mice or other characters from other universes. For the story page (this story), I know that is still incompete just like many of the pages that have incomplete xapps ( like the newspapers comic strips for example). I also have seen some S-coded story pages with incomplete xapps (not counting the ones that have never been published in any countries). If you own this story, do you know if there is another character who is missing in the xapp or is Papirone De Paperoni the only one who should be added?

I wish I never made this report.

The issue Albi d'oro # 55034 has a re-used art (from panel 3 of page 21). It has a note given from indexer ABo or NRa.
Papirone De’Paperoni is one of the main characters in this story. Secondary charactes are many in every disney story but there is no index about them. Some have names some not. This is a unique story. It already has "incomplete" therefore it asks for attention. I saw it as all see it. I happened to be the one to make a report, nothing more. I cannot make an index. Only members from the inducks team can.
I searched in advanced search but no result was given. Advanced search uses open links or any word. An index needs a starting point. This story is a start. If there is another appearance someone else will see and report it.
Guido Martina is the writer of the story. He has a facebook page. For some time now he gives links to many of the stories he created. I have asked him to upload this one too. And if and when he does, I hope you all will find what you want.
I cannot help anymore. My part stop here.

Guido Martina's team answered me that it is in their plans to add this story to their page in the near future.
Like the fb page and you will see it soon and will get images and answers to your guestions.
I hope this will satisfy all.

From inducks page for characters
"There are 8810 official characters in Inducks (5647 of them are one-time characters, 3163 appear in several stories)"
Papirone may become one more one-time character only if an induckser makes the first index. We are users in inducks and cannot perform this action directly.

By the way, I have this story from a recent italian issue. If an index opens I will upload 1 (or more) image of this character in the gallery from any page of the story.
But since it is still unsolved I cannot do anything.

No index is made. Still unsolved.

Papirone de' Paperoni? In Italy name of this character is Paperon de' Paperoni (yes, the same as US!), but he's the "TIC" brother while US is the "TAC" brother (from the "tick-tock" clock). This character however has a nickname: Mani buche de' Paperoni ("Pothole McDuck"). Yes, Italian name is the same as one given to US' uncle Pothole! This happened probably because writer of this story and translator of Barks' story were the same person: Guido Martina. Someone (FWi?) years ago added this character to a French issuefile as "US' twin brother": maybe is it a too generic title?

I've added the character as "US twin brother Mani Buche".

Very Good

This report is for the vol.42 which doesn't allow us to upload the scans for the cover and the stories.

THE SAME HAPPENS FOR 43.

The Same for 44.

The American title is a parody of the movie title. And the translator might have inserted some other references to the movie in his dialogue too (he likes to do that a lot).

But the story itself have no similarities to the movie as far as I can see.

Why my report is cataloged as a BUG? What does this means?
I just see the title I saw in the "Mickey Mouse 315A (2015) Plan Dine from Outer Space!" If it does have anything to do with teh movie fine. Why all this technical talking?
This report was made during the period of the problematic function of inducks for many days. If it was corrupted I had nothing to do with it.

Pavlos, surely you know that "not a bug" means that this is NOT a bug. :-)

This is not an ANSWER. I remind you that I cannot see all you see in inducks, I cannot see all the explanations. If you dont what to answer, then dont.
By the way descriptions are erased all the time. Just erase the description.

Pavlos: I changed the status from "unsolved" to "not a bug" because there is nothing that needs to be done. It's just a matter of keeping track of which reports needs to be dealt with and not. And as the story is not a parody of the movie, there is nothing to be done about this report.

If we had a status that said "not a description", "wrong description" or "bad description" I probably would have used that. But to simplify things, we just have "not a bug" for everything that can't be changed, added or fixed.

There's no hidden explanation about this.

Pavlos:
"Why my report is cataloged as a BUG? What does this means?"

Answer 1: your report is not catalogued as a BUG, it is catalogued as NOT A BUG.
Answer 2: a "bug" is a technical term for an error. So "not a bug" means "this is not an error".

Does this make things more clear?
Do you now understand why I put a smiley :-) in my previous answer?

Uploaded Thumbnails appear and disappear from new scans. Now they disappeared after 27/10.

Changed maintainers to FWi (previously was: FGe,HF,FWi)

Send please to GNt

Ειναι μεσα στα προβληματα που εχει τωρα το ιντακς. Ισως χρειαστει να το ξανακαταχωρησετε.

appeared with the greek images

Changed maintainers to GNt (previously was: FWi)

Solved for the 2nd mistake.
The first mistake for 32X3=96 pages is still not corrected.

It has been solved as far as currently possible. We all are waiting for the (un)famous Italian storyfile to get updated.

This is not the only time there is a wrong indexing of pages for 3-part stories. The mistake is that in in the box for total pages in not the total but always the part-1 pages.

Solved

You could also add the link of the article in the gallery for explanation

The books have only one number and that is the number that is used in Inducks. I do not see any problem with that.
(The "B" numbers that you list are not real numbers, only indications about the order of publication.)

The first print of "Lost in the Andes" didn't have any information about a volume number inside, so we actually started listing the books in the published order. But the rest of the books have the volume number we list printed inside the books. And that's also what Fantagraphics use on their webpage and what online bookstores like Amazone use.

So lising them in the published order only led to a lot of confusion and error reports requesting us to change it to how it is now.

But I added the text "The Books are not published in the same order as the volume number" to the gallery page.

Thank you FAa.
At least there is a typical note about it. As I explained above, it is not a problem of inducks but of fant/cs. And for someone who doesn't know what going on a note was,is,will be needed. It will help those who bought it or will buy it. I hope that in the near future Fant/cs will go back to the printed number.

"As I explained above, it is not a problem of inducks but of fant/cs"

No, as *I* tried to explain, it is not a problem at all. The "B" numbers do not exist.

"I hope that in the near future Fant/cs will go back to the printed number."

This simply does not make sense at all.

Never mind.

It is your oppinion this is not a problem. For others it is a problem and the indexing of inducks did not help. I have a friend who has these volumes and wants to continue to buy all of them. But after we saw the wikipedia article and saw the release dates (B) it made sence to check them by the printed number and be sure there is no volume missing!! And this makes much sence.

You still don't understand what this is about, since you keep talking about "the printed number". The ONLY printed number on the issues is the number that Inducks is using.

But as I write before, never mind. If you don't understand it, too bad, I can't make it more clear than I tried before.

If there was a place in coazilla to upload images of what the article has it would be more clear. I will have these volumes in my hands in a few days and I will check them here and write what they have as numbers.

"I will have these volumes in my hands in a few days and I will check them here"

You can do that, but I already *know*. I had the volumes in my hands when I wrote the previous message. Why don't you simply believe me? :-(

It was never about believing or questioning inducks. It is about the someone wanting to order missing volumes and not end up getting the wrong ones! That is why along with the printed number it will be necessary to know the release date and any other info the volume has, just to be sure. and why not checking them from the original volumes if a friend has them? And all this is because this publication of the complete works of Barks is very popular since it is the only recent in english. And it was a mistake from Fantagraphics part to not understand this and just start normallly, like any other publication, with No1. It is not something personal about you, me or another induckser. It's just a need about the correct info 100%.

Hey Pavlos,
You have the right to invent numbers and ask that we use them in Inducks. However, we will give them as much importance as they really have...

"why not checking them from the original volumes if a friend has them?"

I wrote before:
"I had the volumes in my hands when I wrote the previous message."
Which part of that sentence do you not understand?
Either you have no idea what I wrote (or did not care to read it carefully or ask me what I meant), or you do not trust me and want to check the original volumes AGAIN.

Cacou, I didn't invent any number. You should read all the comments. In the very first sentence I gave the link which has this list. I only did what everyone does when finds something useful. And it was useful to find out the dates according to the number in one list. And from that I wrote A=B. It what I will use to order them for myself.

This is according to the article from wikipedia which is in columns I cannot paste here. Who ever made this article made this list which shows what volume was published (with or without printed number) according to the released day "number". A = B. This list helped those of us couldn't understand all this confusing marketing idea of fantagraphics and wanted to place an order to someone (who does know inducks) that sells them.
5 = 5: 2013-11-10
6 = 4: 2013-05-16
7 = 1: 2011-12-05
8 = 6: 2014-05-02
9 = 8: 2015-05-15
11= 3: 2012-11-07
12= 2: 2012-07-17
13= 9: 2015-10-17
14= 7: 2014-11-05

For Pavlos: thank you for completely ignoring my texts. And for having the nerve to tell someone else "You should read all the comments"...
I still think your English is much worse than you think it is, since you misread and misinterpret the wikipeda article AND all my texts.
Since you ignore my texts, I will ignore yours in the rest of this subject.

For anyone else: the wikipedia page talks about "release order" (this is in the part that Pavlos did NOT quote), which is obviously not the same as "printed number", as Pavlos suggests. So the indexes do not need any change anymore.

Case closed.

Let me explain something.
I asked Pavlos to help me (with info) to buy volumes of the Bark's Library. One seller was using only the wikipedia article "numbers" by the "release order and date" and didn't care at all about inducks. We couldn't agree about the correct numbers and finally we solved the problem by the cover-volume and ignored any kind of number! (I know that others doublecheck any volume they want to buy.)
Inducks is not so well known as you may think it is. And for your information, Pavlos is the only one I know who uses it to help disney fans (not only greeks) find out informatiom about issues. You shouldn't be so rude to someone who advertized (and taught how to use) inducks to many disney fans.
Still cann't understand why the publisher couldn't release the volumes from number 1 like any other publication. It's Barks, in the original english, it will be a big success!
Case closed for me.
Case open for Fantagraphics.

p.s. there should be in COAzilla a way to edit or delete a message/comment after it is send.

BarkScarpa: I think Pavlos is the one being rude when he ignores my messages and questions.
Fantagraphics is not the first to publish "out of order". It is done quite often. Remember the Carl Barks Library from the 1980s?

-Just because someone editor did something not usefull it doesn't mean it will work better in the future. It's bad business. It is the worst thing to bother the buyer with bizarre marketing ideas. They messed up my whole planning to buy these volumes.
-I know of any Barks (or Scarpa) publications from inducks but I know also they are out of market or they cost too much and many not be in good condition. Also I didn't want to have them in b/w.
I am trying to find the lowest price for the new ones. I bought the new italian and greek publications but the english pub/tion has additional interesting material and articles.
-The way I read the messages here, I see that you also ignored everything and only cared defending the inducks indexing.
Cacou even wrote that Pavlos inveted (lol) numbers!!!
Hey people it's not war, it's just comcis!! Cool it down.
-You should add the release dates in each volumes, etc. You have done this in many other publication, here it is muuuch more useful.

-Think seriously about allowing editing these messages by each writer. It will allow those you accuse about their poor english to correct them!
-And another thing, since I cann't write it anywhere else. Inducks has frequently serious technical problems (server, etc). Somewhere Cacou wrote about needed space. Since inducks cann't function as a foruum, facebook group, blog etc, you could put all of this way and have more space for the database, which is the reason we visit this website.

It looks like everything we write is misunderstood or misinterpreted...

"They messed up my whole planning to buy these volumes."
I really don't understand the problem. Simply order your volumes by title (NOT by number) and keep track of the advertisements.

"I know of any Barks (or Scarpa) publications from inducks"
I only mentioned the Carl Barks Library as an example of issues that are published OUT OF ORDER. Because THAT is what the discussion was about.

"The way I read the messages here, I see that you also ignored everything and only cared defending the inducks indexing."
Then I think you read my messages wrongly. I keep trying to tell Pavlos (and now you) that you do not understand the wiki page and that you do not understand what I write. Or that you simply ignore what I write. I asked a question in an attempt to help make myself more clear ("Which part of that sentence do you not understand? ") and I got no answer, so if that is not "ignoring", then what is?
(BTW, it is quite frustrating that my texts seem to be misunderstood and that I don't understand some of your texts. That has an influence on the tone of my texts.)

"Cacou even wrote that Pavlos inveted (lol) numbers!!!"
Pavlos interpreted a publication ORDER as a NUMBER. While we kept saying that there ARE no such numbers.

"You should add the release dates in each volumes"
I fully agree! Don't we do that already? I just checked: every CBDL issue has the publication date in its index. So what is the problem here?

"Think seriously about allowing editing these messages by each writer. It will allow those you accuse about their poor english to correct them!"
I think everyone can edit his own texts. I will try to edit this text after sending it.
--> and this line is added later! Simply go at the COAzilla page again and press the "edit" icon. <--

"you could put all of this way and have more space for the database"
These extra features really don't use much space. Probably less than 1%.
Anyway, we are working on server issues, it will only take some time.

-Pavlos is abroad, with limited interet access.
-I found the edit box next to the name. Thanks. I am still learning of inducks functions. I was searching for it on the right side while writing the new message. I also saw the delete choice.
-FAa's comment at the gallery made it more clear afterwards. The date needed a special note there is a problem with irregular release date.
-You didn't understand what happened. By seeing a volume without No1 made me not ordering it until I find out what happened. I am not an american to see any inner country explaining or advertizing. After seeing that there is no 1,2,3, it was better to buy some volumes cheaper from individuals. This time he was a very difficult one to communicate. I wanted to be sure he was not going to send me something else because he would not except any returning, very serious problem! Anyway it went well by the cover method.
-Still see it a very bad idea not to have a publication so important as this by 1,2,3... And it will be a very bad idea for any kind of publication. Whenever a publisher did something like that, I as a buyer am wondering where the other numbers are and start search for nonexisting issues. It can mees up you buying plans if you have a limited bugget. Ones there was just a disney toy but with no issue (a publication like the italian classicci) and everyone was searching in the shop if the issue fell off! The publisher after hearing many complains explained it was just an "idea"!
Inducks part here can be to add as many helping info as possible if there is something different from the ussual type of publication so that anyone will see it with the first glance.

My friend Andy bought 2 volumes twice because he couldn't remember which ones he had already bought. For the brief time (for now) I could look at 1 of his volumes I couldn't find a number at the side of a volume. Didn't have the time to check the small letters in the inside pages. With the help of the inducks cover gallery he knows the missing volumes he can order. Unfortunately 9 is one of them.
With Gottfredson it was the easiest thing, he has 1 & 2, he will order 3-6.

HF wrote = Fantagraphics is not the first to publish "out of order". It is done quite often. Remember the Carl Barks Library from the 1980s?

There are 20 titles only in inducks-USA about Barks. If they are older publications I only look at the general information. I was more interested for the 90's albums I saw in a friend's house. Unfortunately he had a few.
As for the 80's, you probably mean this one, http://coa.inducks.or...?c=us/CBL. After you mentioned the dates I noticed them. But in the gallery I see 1-10.
If a publication is an exception it is always helpful to know about it from a note in the gallery. But this one has "note - page numbers are listed". How could I understand to check the dates!?
8-)

Andy (in inducks is Andros) has 6 volumes (5-8,11,12). As an info for all users that may read this, only Vol 5,6,8 have in the info page the numbering of the volumes. Vol. 7,11,12 were released first and they have only the info of the other volumes, no numbers. Since all this may continue, the other method to have them in our shelves is to put the by year. This maybe done also for the greek publication for the Barks volumes.

Dupe of #71709.

I made another report because in this code there is more refer which can help the linking. It is not just a duplicate.

Sometimes non-italians can help, sometimes the indexing is locked (maybe for italians also) and they cannot help. f.e I couldn't upload the cover of a recent topolino. For now there is indexing of all issues of this publication.
Therefore is is solved partly.

grammar correction " At list..." is "At Least"

Changed maintainers to GNt (previously was: FWi)

This is a duplicate of 67625.
It marked "solved" but it is not. Until now these 3 issues still have date 2014 not 2015.
If the correction is made thru coa2 it may need to be corrected again.

Please be patient. The changes were made last night and they require one day.

Today all work ok. Corrections ok.

http://coa.inducks.or...gr/MMB++31
http://coa.inducks.or...gr/MMB++32
http://coa.inducks.or...gr/MMB++33

http://coa.inducks.or...gr/MMB++34 not finished

Correction ok. MM34 ok.

Also new scans do not appear from 6+7/2.

welcome back http://coa.inducks.org/index.php
All new scan after 4/2 until today are gone

Το ενθετο δεν ειναι ενα ανεξαρτητο τευχος για να θεωρηθει αυτοτελες. Κυκλοφορησε ως εξτρα τευχος ΜΑΖΙ με καποιο αλλο τευχος. Η υπαρξη λιστας "ενθετα" ειναι σωστη.

A supplement issue is not an independent issue to be added to the independent publications. It is sold as an extra (free) issue WITH another issue. The category "Supplements" is correct to be in this gallery.

Εξ όσων γνώριζα, το τεύχος κυκλοφόρησε ως μία έκτακτη έκδοση του Τερζόπουλου, με δικό του ISBN, για την προώθηση της ταινίας (βλ. επίσης και παρουσίαση στο GC).

Εάν είναι όντως ένθετο, μήπως γνωρίζεις μαζί με ποιο τεύχος έχει κυκλοφορήσει?

Σύμφωνα με σημερινή καταχώρηση(4-8-2015) του cydisneyman στην παρουσίαση του τεύχους Μπαμπούλας ΑΕ στο Greek Comics (post #10), το περιοδικό κυκλοφόρησε μαζί με το Μίκυ Μάους # 1879. Για να γίνει όμως η καταχώρηση στο INDUCKS πρέπει να διασταυρωθεί και από άλλες πηγές

Ευχαριστώ!

Solved

Seems to be solved.

This story was printed in greek KOMIX 7 and we see from the new index that automatically the greek index is mistaken also, for part 1. The pages 36 must change to 139 and then check if 36 went to part 1 for all countries.

Duplicate or not, the story has a mistake which affects all other indexing.
Also since it is duplicate, you could report the number of the older one just to see how long it is unsolved.
AND, an idea for inducksers, to avoit duplicates, can you add an "alarm" the second a report is going to be sent ?

I have tried to find the first report with many filters but only mine opened.

The other report is report #65435 (reported in October last year).

65435 is not visible to all users.

still not corrected

still not corrected

for Γέλιο και Χαρά # 355, in case it does not open it

the same is for Almanaco 107. The attach open only for "Ινδιάνα Γκούφυ" without the number.

I didn't have any issues opening the attached issues. Both links work fine. I was able to go to the page of both "Φαντομ Ντακ για Πάντα" and "Ινδιάνα Γκούφυ"

Then it is an inducks problem because it opens first "There is a problem with this website’s security certificate".

there is am image that does not belong in inducks

Everyday I see issues, new and old, especially from Greece, the cover is in the wrong place. Francois please fix the program because they are too many to be fix 1 by 1.

Mostly the covers with GREEK codes have the problem. To whom it may concern, the greek codes are valid.

Italy: Topolino (libretto) # 243

Μεχρι αυτη τη στιγμη δεν φαινεται καμμια διορθωση ουτε στο ονομα ουτε στο κωδικο. Η αναφορα μου δεν ειναι duplicate γιατι αναφερω ΔΥΟ λαθη οπου το δευτερο, ο λαθος κωδικος εχει αλλη σοβαροτητα λαθους απο ενα απλο ορθογραφικο λαθακι.

COAzilla 64501 και 64488. Τα συγκεκριμένα λάθη είχαν ήδη αναφερθεί.

solved

στην αναφορα μου 64518 γραφω οτι υπαρχει κι αλλο λαθος στο τευχος ΜΜ10. Νομιζω οτι μια γενικη επαληθευση θα ηταν επιβεβλημενη.

Υπαρχει ενα σοβαρο προβλημα μετακινησης της θεσης του εξωφυλλου σε πολλλα τευχη αλλα εχω παρατηρησει οτι κυριως οπου εχω δει ελληνικο κωδικο εξωφυλλου εχει υπαρξει μετακινηση. Αυτο συμβαινει εδω και πολλες βδομαδες. Οποτε γινονταν το ιδιο στο παρελθον αυτο οφειλοταν στο outducks. Ειναι προφανες οτι υπαρχει καποια αλλαγη στο προγραμμα του inducks/outducks. Το προβλημα ειναι οτι δεν γνωριζουμε ποτε θα ασχοληθει καποιος induckers (ο γαλλος), ουτε μηπως καλου κακου στο μεταξυ να τσεκαρουμε και (στα τευχη με το προβλημα) τους κωδικους ιστοριων κλπ κλπ. Δυστυχως για εσας που εισαστε στην ελληνικη ομαδα, εχει δημιουργηθει ενας εξτρα ογκος εργασιας που δεν ηταν καθολου αναγκαιο να υπαρξει. Περιλαμβανω και τις προσπαθειες διορθωσης και την επιμονη του προγραμματος να τις ξαναλλαζει στο λαθος. Και ο καθε απλος επισκεπτης μπορει να κανει ελεγχο τευχων αλλα ειναι καλυτερα να υπαρξει συνεννοηση με την ομαδα για να μην γινεται διπλος ελεγχος και για να μην παει ο κοπος του χαμενος.
Γραφω εδω αυτο την αναφορα μηπως και καποιος απο εσας μπορεσει να μαθει τι θα γινει.

because it doesn't open their index as BRB.BRF

Also for 39

Today I tried it again but it still showing the same.
Instead of showing [all] the covers it is still showing from [501-546]. It takes a few seconds.

the spanish gallery of Dumbo has still the same problem. It does show all the covers but only the last hundred.

Today I opened from new scans to see covers of Netherlands: Donald Duck Pocket (3e reeks). 1-100, 101-200 was ok but the other and ALL does not work. It shows only a few covers. The same happens in some other galleries also but most of them work with ALL. This started when the box for numbers went also to the bottom of the page.

FIXED by CGZ

I do not know why it has it on main. I open coa from 282.

Υπενθυμιση.
Στο Κομιξ 282 το 6β μπορει να παρει κωδικο οταν τον γραψουν στον αντιστοιχο τομο.
Δεν ξερω γιατι δεν παραπεμπει στο κομιξ 282 και βαζει main.

Changed maintainers to GNt (previously was: FWi)

Πηρε κωδικο XUC CBDL 1

fixed by oyster.
solved

It works fine if you search "LW" instead.

Yes, I just saw that it works with LW and BW for Big Bad Wolf. It used to work with LBW and BBW instead. But not everyone knows these details, or knows where some are writen.
But when inducks has a method of search f.e. to submit a name otherwise you cannot proceed, it can be corrected to give more obtions.

Have you searched "P'tit Loup"? It doesn't works either.

Fixed.

I was searching for the covers of these characters thru the advanced search for covers and illustrations.
And yes I know that there are missing pages because the list is alphabetical by country code.

I added the 'Next 200' button.

I've made some changes, let's see if that works as expected.

Until now, no, it is not working. Even though the CVS is ok, it doesn't appear the same. Maybe it's a sign, because it's the last indexed Mickey Mouse. Maybe we should delete it and create a new field from the beginning (I backed up the cvs in case you choose this solution).

Until now the issue appears double with wrong indexings. the solution of deleting it and only one makes the index I think it maybe the best solution.
It the end of an era. At least inducks continues to give us a reason to look at new issues from other countries, and maybe buy them.

Just saw it. Appears correctly indexed.

The issue has been fixed since yesterday. All is well now.

Works Fine here...

I notice the same problem too when I search covers for Duck Characters. Note: It works fine if you search in the Universe box like "Forest".

I tried "covers" with "Mickey", Grandma Duck" and it's still the same. The second page is always the same, from ARC codes.

Please try to search "Universe: Mice or Ducks" or different universe like "Forest". I tried this many times before I saw this problem with Advanced Search.

I am searching for covers of some specific characters, mostly from the universe of Ducks. This problem appeared 1-2 days ago.
Advanced search is the only way to find whatever you search.
And if you try the character index and the title "covers", it has always much less results than A/S.

It seems there is a problem with characters pages too not only with Advanced Search. Same if you search for stories on Donald Duck's page and it will show stories in the second page where he does not appear.

The problem still remains.
I have tried "Grandma Duck" with Stories, covers, etc and every time the second page ignores what we ask.
A part of the problem I think is the two words that it recognizes as two parts of search. It does not recognize "grandma duck" but "grandma" and "duck". I also tried April, May and June and removed the "and" because it also regonnized it as different word. It didn't work.
I don't know techical turns (if a bug is to be blamed) but a few days ago all was fine. Therefore the problem must be found in what happened in inducks the past 4-5 days.

The boxes I used were "character" and "kind".

I changed a few days ago some old PHP code that was completely unsafe.

I tried to search for Grandma Duck stories and from teh results the "next" button worked ( http://coa.inducks.or...sort1=auto )

Can you send me the URL of a search with the "next 200" button that
doesn't work? or describe exactly what you did? Thanks.

To me, Cacou's link open a list of B stories

http://img534.imagesh...0/v754.jpg

I have tried the same search for "Grandma duck" for "covers & ill/tions" and every time and the same second page and the next pages continue from that. (I hope this is the url that will help)
http://coa.inducks.or...sort1=auto

I have tried to open the index of Daisy with "Date of First publication" to see the first 200 results. They were all those which had no date. It does that anyway. But the second page is the following.
http://coa.inducks.or...cationdate

OK, fixed.

Have just tried "Fethry" (not Fethry Duck) covers and it is ok.

But check the index (by 50 results) of Fethry, first page, no8-11, there is no Fethry in the indexing.
http://coa.inducks.or...=FE&view=4

In Tabby's page, you can see some stories with Black cat and the story with other Tabby from W WDC 65-02.

This is because Fethry was added to some versions of the covers.
For instance "DDF(R)appet 18 p. 020a (2011) [1/2 pg.] [Background is a grass field and FE has been added to the foreground]" in W OS 450-00. This is the same for Tabby vs. black cat (but in that case, this is probably due to an error in the data not in the search engine itself. These differences are automatically reported and slowly corrected).

needs refer

Changed maintainers to PCa,FSp,MBa (previously was: FWi)

Still unsolved. It has the pages of part 1, not from all parts (30+25+25+30 pages)

Since it has "main" I am writing here that it it about the greek issue Komix 301 and will make another report.

I won't make another report with the same text since it doesn't open it to this issue but remains to the main.

The p 34abcd have yellow color because they are in the center of the issue and have been flagged as "centerfold". Because... they are in the middle of the issue with different numbering. As you said, if someone removes them, the story goes from 34 to 35 like nothing was there, so the 32 pages are "centerfold / κεντρικό σαλόνι". The centerfold however is marked with yellow, even if is about a story.

"pg 1-32abcd" does not fit in the box anyway, but also doesn't make clearer than "pg 34abcd". If we were indexing the pages with a,b,c, etc, we could be able to solve it easily, but since we are using pages, we have to name it as a page, or else it will go in the end of the index. So, we number it with a nearby page and a,b,c, etc. Hence the "p 34abcd" indexing I used.

However, I made some notifications at the heading of the issue and after those 4 stories, so it can be clear to everyone.

The issue now is corrected (issue.php?c=gr/KX++301), it can't get clearer than this :)

"Παρεμβάλλεται μεταξύ των σελίδων 34 & 35" can give the idea of the special printing style of this issue.
I don't know if this "idea" is used in issues in any country, but now they have 301 as an example.

solved

Qgr/MM 2335-36A has already a reference to IC TL 2713

now it is ok

I TL 1705-AP Paperolimpiadi

I think it is a german (?) hacker and writes diffenent text in codes I opened.

It is not in every code, it is in D-codes, H-codes. It has a blue "see OCR'ed text" under refer and it is not the same text each time. Maybe he found a "door" thru voting.

FWi, this is a software bug. Please fix it.

Looks like massive spam ...

The text of the scans is being converted automatically into text: https://coa.inducks.o...1367146857 The software of course cannot process anything correctly, that's why the text is not readable.

It is useful for search purposes: https://coa.inducks.o...php?mode=8

:)

Yes, this is indeed not a software bug. Our OCR engine is unfortunately not very smart (for now) so it doesn't catch a lot of words correctly.

I consider the fact that everyone can see the OCR texts a software bug. If this was intended, some explanation is needed on the site.

My intention was to show this text to indexers only, but somehow it was visible to anyone. I've corrected that. I don't think a lot of explanations are needed if it's not public.
I think it is useful to see the OCR text for debugging purposes. But there is little use to "normal" users.

Now the codes appear ok.

> My intention was to show this text to indexers only
Yep. Bug fixed.

Απο τα σκαν στο τευχος διακρινονται οι εξης τιτλοι
Α= ΤΟ ΜΥΣΤΙΚΟ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤΡΙΝΑΣ
Β= Η ΦΑΡΜΑ ΤΩΝ ΑΣΤΡΩΝ-ΦΕΥΓΟΥΜΕ ΓΙΑ ΑΛΛΟΥΣ ΓΑΛΑΞΙΕΣ
Γ= Η ΦΑΡΜΑ ΤΩΝ ΑΣΤΡΩΝ-ΑΝΙΧΝΕΥΣΗ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ ΠΛΑΝΗΤΗ
Δ= Η ΦΑΡΜΑ ΤΩΝ ΑΣΤΡΩΝ-ΕΠΙΘΕΣΗ ΑΣΤΕΡΟΕΙΔΩΝ = I TL2313-03
Ε= Ο ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΟΣ ΠΑΙΧΤΗΣ
ΣΤ= ΨΑΧΝΟΝΤΑΣ ΤΟΝ ΤΥΠΟ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΣΦΡΑΓΙΔΑ

solved today by phantom duck

Pavlos, Kriton already reported this error.

I used D90026 with the coa filter and it didn't open any report.
It would be helpful to note the number of the other report if there is a duplicate.
In any case, this error remains unsolved. Maybe an induckser could just erase it thru cvs.

After search with various filters I found that the other report is 50598.

khmmm... for some reason, the cover appeared after my report!!!

Very puzzling text: "There is an X in its place".
It seems to mean that the web browser is not showing a picture.
That can be network probems, slow internet, or a computer not connected.
Nothing to do with COA or Inducks.

Whitman one shots 90 # 086 A
The problem is here. The cover does not appear with any browser although it exists in the code. There is an X where the cover picture should be. My guess is there is a problem with the file of this cover in outducks, maybe it is lost or it needs to be uploaded again.

And like it happened 16/1 after this report... the cover... appeared!
No network, internet, browser or connection problems. All other data from inducks and other websites appear normally.
It least I saved it with the cover.

Which page are you talking about?

All the issue is missing.
From my files from some years ago, I copied this. The columes cannot be copied correctly here.

======================

IC TL 1369 Paperina, Paperino W il carnevale 1 p. cover Writing: ?
Art: Marco Rota Appearances: Daisy Duck, Donald Duck DD and DA dancing at a party

b
I TL 1369-A Topolino Topolino e il mistero degli orologi stonati
31 p. 3 rows per page Writing: Staff di IF Art: Sergio Asteriti
Also printed in: RCD 2, CD 147, TM 2, GCD 168, GTL 13+ Appearances: Chief O'Hara, Goofy, Mickey Mouse

c
S 80137 Paperino Paperino e la baia "segreta" 14 p. 3 rows per page Writing: Ed Nofziger Art: Jaime Diaz Studio Also printed in: RCD 19, CD 192, PM 169, RCDMF 1 Appearances: Daisy Duck, Donald Duck, Gladstone Gander Secret beach

d
S 78095 GM Le GM e la ricompensa... potabile 12 p. 3 rows per page Writing: Ed Nofziger Pencils: Tony Strobl Ink: ?

e
S 79191 Zio Paperone Zio Paperone e l'impossibile ritorno 13 p. 3 rows per page Writing: Ed Nofziger Pencils: Jaime Diaz Studio
Ink: ? Appearances: Billy Goat, Grandma Duck, Uncle Scrooge

f
I TL 1369-B Paperino Paperino e la perla delle beffe 22 p. 3 rows per page Writing: Bruno Mandelli Art: Giuseppe Perego, Roberto Marini
Also printed in: RCD 13, CD 170, GCD 178*, CD 351 Appearances: Donald Duck, Huey Dewey and Louie, Rockerduck, The Beagle Boys, Uncle Scrooge

g
Qit/TL 1369g Nessuno (Avviso) 1/2 p. text Writing: ? Art: ? Appearances: No one This list may be incomplete
Avviso della mancata uscita del prossimo numero per sciopero

See comment
issue 1370 was never printed for a strike

all other topolino issues appear correctly

fixed

The image is there now but it needs the code IC TL 390. This is what it had written in the old files.

Since I cannot write on 49147, I am writing here.
The problem for 49147 is solved, the pages and codes appear correctly, and if the above "website unavailable..." was not there, all the pages I see are ok.
If any info is lost in a inducks-greek page we will index it again.

Today 4/2/2013 inducks didn't open.
Now it is open but there are errors as it writes at the bottom of every page we open.
Also, all new scan do not appear.

Maybe you should check what you changed these few months in the programming (a command that does not work correctly) before this problem appeared. Also, after you fix the present problem, just in case, please check if the connection of inducks-outducks works correctly.

No image appears in any issue, or in any index.
The index of creators is still anavailable because of CPU problems as it writes.

5/1/2013
All data in inducks appear correctily. Creator's index still closed.

Report for Slovenian Mikijev zabavnik issues must be sent using this page https://coa.inducks.o...lved=47329

47329 does not exist/appear in (my) coa list, therefore I don't have any other place to report this.
Also, this report is not solved because the mistake for image on 43 haven't been corrected to 44 and the wrong image still appears in all references, from which I saw it.

Pavlos,
The yu/MZS index is periodically imported into Inducks from another database. We have to send corrections to the maintainer because we don't edit the source files ourselves.
For this we put all corrections together, and when we have enough of them, we ask for an update. Your request for changes has been noted by Marko. The update will come later; it can take months because this is not done automatically.
The scan problem will be automatically solved when the code has been updated.

You mention "another database". If there is a link, it can be added in the country's openning page, like it is done in other countries where there are links about disney comics. Sometimes they are useful for the users. Some still open, some other are closed or not updated.

please erase this. It is correct. Gus is alone in this story. The first -title- panel confused me.

fixed